Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 202.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is much better than Galaxy A10s, getting an 87 score against 73.8. Both devices we are comparing come with the same Android 11 operating system. Motorola razr (2020) is a somewhat heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A10s, but both are 0.31inches thick. Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has more RAM.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a higher 876 x 2142 pixels resolution and a higher pixel quantity in each inch of display. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy A10s, because it has a way higher (4K) video resolution, a camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution and a larger aperture.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A10s has a really longer battery performance than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 43% more battery capacity.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A10s. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the Galaxy A10s, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.