Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-27 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia 9 PureView is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, with a score of 76.4 against 73.8. The Nokia 9 PureView is a a little bit heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A10s, but they have the same thickness. The Nokia 9 PureView features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a lot greater display density and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
Nokia 9 PureView features slightly more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Nokia 9 PureView features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia 9 PureView also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A10s features better battery lifetime than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 20 percent bigger battery size. The Nokia 9 PureView features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a back facing camera with lesser megapixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Nokia 9 PureView also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video resolution.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A10s. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy A10s, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.