Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy A10s, with a 91.3 score against 73.8. Even though the Galaxy A52 5G is newer than Samsung Galaxy A10s, it is heavier and just a bit thicker. These devices work with Android OS, but the Galaxy A52 5G has a more recent 12 version and Samsung Galaxy A10s has Android 11, providing the user some extra features and performance tweaks.
Galaxy A52 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A52 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a brighter display than Galaxy A10s, because it has a quite larger display, a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a better pixels count in each display inch.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G takes way better photos and videos than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has a much higher video resolution and a much more MP back camera. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A10s, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy A10s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.