Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-08-27 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M20 has a global score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A10s's general score of 73.8. These devices come with Android operating system, but Galaxy M20 has the previous 10 version while Galaxy A10s has Android 11. Although it's the best device in this comparison, the Galaxy M20 is a just a bit heavier and somewhat thicker device than the Galaxy A10s.
The Galaxy A10s has a bit better processor than Galaxy M20, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Samsung Galaxy M20 has a brighter display than Galaxy A10s, because it has a little bigger screen, a lot greater display density and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340px.
The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy M20 also has 64 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy M20 has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A10s, although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photography, they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a back-facing camera with a 13 mega pixels resolution and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution.
Galaxy M20 counts with better battery duration than Galaxy A10s, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.