Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-08-27 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.91 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a bit better than Galaxy A10s, with an 80.4 score against 73.8. Galaxy Note Fan Edition's body has the same thickness than Galaxy A10s, but it is a little lighter. Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a sharper display than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution and way more pixels per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition takes clearer videos and photos than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a back-facing camera with lesser mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture and a much better (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a little bit more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A10s has longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A10s. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A10s, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.