Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-27 | -- |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 has a general score of 82.6, which is better than Galaxy A10s's overall score of 73.8. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 has the newer 14 version while Galaxy A10s has Android 11, giving you lots of additional features and some performance improvements. Galaxy S25 is a extremely thinner and a lot lighter phone than the Galaxy A10s.
Samsung Galaxy A10s features a much better performing processor than Galaxy S25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy S25 has a lot better screen than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy S25 also has a much higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot better quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 features a little bit better storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A10s, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy S25 shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a back camera with much more MP and a lot better video definition.
The Galaxy S25 and Galaxy A10s have incredibly similar battery durations.
Although Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy A10s. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A10s, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.