Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-27 | -- |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.93 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy A10s, getting a 90.7 score against 73.8. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version and Galaxy A10s has Android 11. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a extremely lighter and noticeably thinner device than the Galaxy A10s.
Galaxy A10s features a much better performing processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a much better pixels count per display inch, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a bit bigger screen.
Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy A10s, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a very superior camera than Galaxy A10s, because it has a bigger camera aperture for better low light captures, a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a way better video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A10s, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.