Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 271 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro is just a bit better than the Galaxy A10s, getting a overall score of 81 against 73.8. Even being the best in our current comparison, we must tell that it's also a way heavier and a lot thicker cellphone. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't notice any differences regarding operating system features.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340, a quite larger screen and a way higher pixel amount per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A10s, because it has a 1% larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy A10s. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Samsung Galaxy A10s, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.