Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 202.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Samsung Galaxy A10s, getting a global score of 88.5 against 73.8. The Galaxy Z Flip design is a little bit heavier but a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A10s, and they were only released 6 months apart. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and Samsung Galaxy A10s has Android 11, so it gives some extra features.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A10s, because it has a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px, a lot more pixels per display inch and a quite bigger display.
Galaxy Z Flip has a better camera than Galaxy A10s, because although it has a back facing camera with less MP resolution, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy Z Flip also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy A10s, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A10s counts with greater battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A10s, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A10s. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, else you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A10s, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.