Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-08-27 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.18 x 2.98 x 0.31 inches | 6.64 x 3.04 x 0.41 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Green and Red | Armor gray, Lightning black and Star silver |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.91 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4720mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has a global score of 86.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A10s's 73.8 score. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A10s has Android 11. Even though Xiaomi Black Shark 3 is a better cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A10s, we must highlight that it is also notably thicker and a lot heavier.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a sharper display than Galaxy A10s, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a quite bigger display and a greater pixels density. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a little bit more memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A10s, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A10s, because it has a 4720mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 features a lot better camera than Galaxy A10s, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 also has a lot better resolution camera and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.