Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-12-21 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Aurora black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A12's 80.3 general score. Both of these phones come with the same Android 10 OS (Operating System). LG V50 ThinQ's construction is a little bit thinner and lighter than Galaxy A12, despite of the fact that it was released a little bit further than a year before.
LG V50 ThinQ has a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher 1440 x 3120px resolution and a much higher display pixels density. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A12, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy A12, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A12 has longer battery lifetime than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a camera that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy A12's camera, because although the LG V50 ThinQ has a back camera with a way worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much larger camera aperture to take better low-light photos and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.