Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black and Blue |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A12 has a general score of 80.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's global score of 76.4. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A12 has the older 10 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A12 is somewhat heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo, it's a lot thinner and notably newer.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a little better processing power than Galaxy A12, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 4 less processing cores , it also counts with a GPU. Motorola Droid Turbo features a way better display than Galaxy A12, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a way greater pixel count per display inch and a lot higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Galaxy A12 has a slightly better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy A12 also has a back camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution and faster video frame rate. Galaxy A12 features a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A12 counts with improved battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.