Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.3 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-12-21 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| LCD | AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A12 is just a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a overall score of 80.3 against 77.8. Samsung Galaxy A12 is an a lot older and extremely thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung made it a bit lighter anyway. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A12 has 10 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A12, because it has a lot higher screen pixel density, a bigger display and a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A12, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Galaxy A12 features a way better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A12, because it has a back camera with a better 50 MP resolution, a bigger aperture and a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy A12, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.