Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Smoke black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| $ 230.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 9.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A16 5G has an overall score of 76.2, which is a bit better than Moto G Power's 76.1 score. Both phones we are comparing use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A16 5G has a more recent 14 version and Moto G Power has Android 11 version, providing you a lot of extra features and performance tweaks. The Galaxy A16 5G design is somewhat thinner but a bit heavier than Moto G Power.
Moto G Power counts with a much powerful CPU than Galaxy A16 5G. They have a 4 GB RAM and 8 cores. Galaxy A16 5G features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little worse display density, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340.
The Moto G Power takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a way lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture to take better low light photos. Galaxy A16 5G counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Moto G Power, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1000 GB and more internal storage.
Moto G Power counts with a battery duration that is just as good as the battery lifetime in Samsung Galaxy A16 5G.
Although Galaxy A16 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Moto G Power. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Moto G Power, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.