Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass |
| $ 230.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 MP2 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 9.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy A16 5G, with a global score of 78.3 against 76.2. The vivo X70 Pro is a just a bit lighter cellphone than Galaxy A16 5G, but both are equally thin. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS, but the vivo X70 Pro has the previous 11 version and Galaxy A16 5G has Android 14 version.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy A16 5G counts with a little bit better screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little inferior pixel amount per inch in the screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a greater storage to install applications and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The vivo X70 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy A16 5G, and although they both have the same resolution camera, the vivo X70 Pro also has a larger aperture.
The Galaxy A16 5G features just a bit better battery life than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.