Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-06-19 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ has a general score of 82.5, which is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A21s's 77.7 general score. LG V30S ThinQ's body is thinner and lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A21s, even though it was released many years before. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the LG V30S ThinQ has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Samsung Galaxy A21s has Android 10 version, providing the user a couple nice extra features.
LG V30S ThinQ has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A21s, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The LG V30S ThinQ features a much sharper screen than Galaxy A21s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels and a way greater amount of pixels per inch in the screen.
LG V30S ThinQ has a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A21s, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy A21s counts with a slightly better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light captures, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A21s also counts with a way higher resolution back-facing camera and a much bigger sensor.
The Galaxy A21s counts with a much longer battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 52% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.