Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-19 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.77 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Red and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A21s, getting an 81.3 score against 77.7. LG V35 ThinQ is an notably older phone than Samsung Galaxy A21s, but it is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The LG V35 ThinQ has a way better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A21s, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a much higher screen density.
The LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A21s, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy A21s captures slightly better videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A21s also counts with a way bigger sensor and a way better resolution camera.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A21s, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A21s has a really longer battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.