Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-06-24 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.16 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Gray, Mint, Violet and White | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.18 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.34 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A22 5G has an overall score of 84.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Note7's overall score of 79.5. Although the Galaxy A22 5G is noticeably newer than Galaxy Note7, it is somewhat thicker and heavier. The Galaxy A22 5G has a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy Note7 has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G takes just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photos and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a lot better resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy A22 5G has a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a way better battery life than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 43 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.