Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-02 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Peach and White | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.03 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS is much better than Galaxy A23 5G, getting an 84.2 score against 71.9. IPhone XS's construction is somewhat lighter and just a little bit thinner than the Galaxy A23 5G, although it was released 4 years before. The Apple iPhone XS features a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has less CPU cores (but faster), and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The iPhone XS counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher pixel density and a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution. The iPhone XS's memory capacity for apps and games is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A23 5G's one, both have equal internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G has a much longer battery life than iPhone XS, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 2659mAh. IPhone XS shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a back facing camera with lot less mega pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 aperture, the iPhone XS also counts with a lot larger sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.