Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-02 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Peach and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, with a 98.9 score against 71.9. Both phones in our current comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version while Samsung Galaxy A23 5G has Android 12. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's construction is a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, but it's just a bit heavier and was released 2 years before.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a brighter display than Galaxy A23 5G, because it has a just a bit better number of pixels in each inch in the screen, a bit larger screen and a better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A23 5G, because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a way better processing power than Galaxy A23 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A23 5G, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy A23 5G counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.