Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-02 | 2018-03-16 |
| 6.48 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Peach and White | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S9 is better than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, with an 83.3 score against 71.9. Galaxy S9's body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, but it's somewhat lighter. Samsung Galaxy S9 has a sharper screen than Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels amount per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels.
The Galaxy S9 counts with a much greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G. They have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The Galaxy S9 features a way bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy A23 5G, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S9 also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 400 GB.
The Galaxy A23 5G features a much better battery performance than Galaxy S9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy S9 shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A23 5G, because although it has a camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a much bigger sensor and a larger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.