Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| -- | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| -- | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 396 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A25, with a general score of 81.5 against 74.3. Even being the best we are comparing, Motorola Moto G 5G is a somewhat thicker and a bit heavier cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A25. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Moto G 5G has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A25 has Android 14.
Galaxy A25 counts with a bit sharper display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per display inch. The Moto G 5G has a much greater hardware performance than Galaxy A25, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy A25 features more storage to store more apps and games than Moto G 5G, because it has more internal memory and an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB. Moto G 5G features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25, because although it has a back camera with a worse resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
Motorola Moto G 5G's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery performance in Galaxy A25.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.