Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.3 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 1000 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G68 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is way better than Galaxy A25's 74.3 general score. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an older 13 version while Galaxy A25 has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a a little bit thinner but just a bit heavier cellphone than the Galaxy A25.
The Galaxy A25 has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, although it has a bit lower number of pixels per display inch, a quite smaller display and a lot lower 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy A25, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy A25 counts with a bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A25 also has an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy A25 features a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A25, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a back facing camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.