Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A30 has a score of 79.6, which is a little bit better than the Honor 50 Pro's 77 overall score. The Galaxy A30 is an noticeably older device than Honor 50 Pro, but Samsung made it somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner. Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A30, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Honor 50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Honor 50 Pro features a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a bit higher amount of pixels in each display inch, a quite better resolution of 1236 x 2676 and a little bit bigger display. The Honor 50 Pro counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for taking pictures and/or video in low light situations, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a way higher 108 mega-pixels resolution back camera.
Honor 50 Pro has more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A30, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Galaxy A30 and the Honor 50 Pro feature incredibly similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.