Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-03-02 | 2018-11-09 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Black and Gray |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.76 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A30 has an overall score of 79.6, which is just a bit better than LG G7 Fit's score of 77. Although Samsung Galaxy A30 and the LG G7 Fit were released with only a couple of months difference, the Samsung Galaxy A30 design is just a bit thinner but also a little heavier. The LG G7 Fit counts with a lot better looking display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The LG G7 Fit counts with a little bit better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. LG G7 Fit's CPU is very similar to Galaxy A30's processor, and although the LG G7 Fit has a lower number of cores , they both have the same RAM amount.
LG G7 Fit features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking worse quality videos and pictures and a lot smaller aperture which is not good for taking photos and/or video in low light situations, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the LG G7 Fit also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition.
The Galaxy A30 counts with longer battery lifetime than LG G7 Fit, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.