Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.6 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-03-02 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue and White | Interstellar Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a global score of 83.4, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A30's 79.6 score. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro is a extremely newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A30, although it is thicker and somewhat heavier. Motorola Edge 40 Pro has a bit better looking display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a little bit lower display density, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a bit bigger display.
Galaxy A30 counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores. Motorola Edge 40 Pro features more storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A30, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality and a camera with a much higher resolution.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A30, because it has a 15 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.