Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 is a little bit better than Google Pixel 3 XL, with an 81.3 score against 80.7. Galaxy A31 is a newer device than Google Pixel 3 XL, although it's just a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy A31. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 3 XL counts with just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960px and a greater display density. The Samsung Galaxy A31 features a superior camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photographs and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also counts with a way bigger camera sensor which gives a way higher photo and video quality and a camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Galaxy A31 features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A31 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A31 has a very superior battery duration than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 46 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.