Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Holographic white |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 has a score of 81.3, which is slightly better than LG Stylo 6's 76.7 general score. Both of these devices use the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any differences in that aspect. Galaxy A31 is a lighter phone than the LG Stylo 6, but both of them have the same thickness.
The LG Stylo 6 and Samsung Galaxy A31 count with quite similar screens, because although the LG Stylo 6 has a quite worse amount of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2460px and a quite bigger screen. The LG Stylo 6 counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy A31. Both have 8 cpu cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Galaxy A31 takes much clearer videos and photos than LG Stylo 6, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot higher resolution back-facing camera.
The LG Stylo 6 has a very superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the LG Stylo 6 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with improved battery life than LG Stylo 6, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.