Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Velvet has a general score of 87.1, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A31's 81.3 global score. Even though the LG Velvet and Samsung Galaxy A31 were released with only 1 months difference, the LG Velvet is just a little bit thinner and just a little bit lighter. LG Velvet has a display that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A31 one, because although the LG Velvet has a just a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2460 resolution and a quite bigger screen.
The LG Velvet features just a bit better performance than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG Velvet also has 2 GB more RAM. LG Velvet has a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has 64 GB more internal storage and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy A31 has greater battery performance than LG Velvet, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4300mAh. The LG Velvet counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a camera in the back with a 48 megapixels and a same size camera sensor, the LG Velvet also has a bigger aperture and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.