Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro is much better than the Galaxy A31, with a 92.8 score against 81.3. Motorola Edge 20 Pro's construction is newer and a little bit thinner, but also just a bit heavier than Galaxy A31. These phones use Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 20 Pro has 12 version and Galaxy A31 has Android 10 version.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has a little sharper display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also counts with a little bit bigger display. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro has more storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro features just a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has more RAM. Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a bigger aperture and a much more MP camera in the back.
The Galaxy A31 counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.