Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 has a general score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's global score of 78.5. The Galaxy A31 construction is older, thicker and a little bit heavier than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A31 has the older 10 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12.
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy A31, because although it has a bit worse pixels density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion also counts with a bit larger display. Galaxy A31 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion features a superior camera than Galaxy A31, because it has a higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality, a way larger back camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures and a bigger aperture for better low-light images and video.
Galaxy A31 features a bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A31 counts with a bit better battery life than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.