Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 has a score of 81.3, which is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's general score of 80.9. Both phones in our current comparison come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A31 has 10 version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version. Galaxy A31's construction is just a little bit lighter than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, although it's a little bit thicker and was released many years before.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a quite lower pixels amount per inch in the display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra also counts with a quite larger screen. Galaxy A31 counts with a really superior processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge 30 Ultra features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot more MP back camera, a much larger sensor shooting way higher quality photos and a bigger aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited environments.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a battery life that is very similar to the battery life in Samsung Galaxy A31.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.