Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A31, having an 86.3 score against 81.3. Both of these devices have Android operating system, but the Motorola Edge 50 Pro has the newer 14 version while Samsung Galaxy A31 has Android 10 version. Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a incredibly newer and a little thinner cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy A31, but it is also a little heavier.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a bit inferior pixels amount in each screen inch, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 50 Pro also counts with a bit bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A31, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy A31 has a much more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy A31 counts with just a little better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A31, because it has a much larger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs, a much better (4K) video definition, a much larger aperture to take better low light photography and videos and a back-facing camera with a better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.