Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a bit better than Galaxy A31, having a overall score of 87.1 against 81.3. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra body has the same thickness than the Galaxy A31, but it's just a little bit heavier. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version and Galaxy A31 has Android 10.
Galaxy A31 has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a quite inferior pixels amount per display inch, and they both have the same 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a bit larger screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and videos, a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos, a back camera with more megapixels and a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Galaxy A31 has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.