Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G is a bit better than the Galaxy A31, with a overall score of 81.5 against 81.3. These phones work with the same Android 10 operating system, so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding that. Even being the best cellphone in our current comparison, Moto G 5G's construction is heavier and thicker than the Galaxy A31.
The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A31. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. The Galaxy A31 counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2400 resolution, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display.
The Motorola Moto G 5G shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a much higher video definition and a larger aperture. Moto G 5G features a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Moto G 5G also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola Moto G 5G's battery performance is very similar to the battery duration in Galaxy A31.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.