Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 is slightly better than Motorola Moto G Power, getting an 81.3 score against 76.1. Even when the Galaxy A31 and Motorola Moto G Power were only released with a couple months difference, the Galaxy A31 is just a little bit lighter and thinner. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Galaxy A31 has older 10 version while Motorola Moto G Power has Android 11.
Samsung Galaxy A31 has a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit better pixels count per screen inch. The Motorola Moto G Power's CPU is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A31 one, both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM.
The Galaxy A31 shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution camera.
Samsung Galaxy A31 and Moto G Power have quite similar storage for games and applications, both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB. Moto G Power's battery performance is very similar to Galaxy A31's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.