Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 has an overall score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 overall score. Galaxy A31's design is extremely newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's, although it is heavier and way thicker. Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater screen density.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy A31, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A31. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount.
Samsung Galaxy A31 shoots much better videos and photos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate, the same (Full HD) video resolution and a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has a way larger back camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and photos and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a way better battery performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has an 83% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.