Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 has an overall score of 81.3, which is slightly better than Motorola One Zoom's 80 global score. The Galaxy A31 construction is just a little lighter and a bit thinner than the Motorola One Zoom, even though both of them were released with only a couple of months difference. The Motorola One Zoom and Galaxy A31 count with similar processing units, they have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also has a little better pixel quantity per inch in the display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Motorola One Zoom takes a little bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a same resolution camera and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Motorola One Zoom also has a way higher (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture.
The Motorola One Zoom features a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A31, because although it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A31 has better battery duration than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.