Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A31 is slightly better than Galaxy A25 5G, getting a score of 81.3 against 79.9. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS, but the Galaxy A31 has the older 10 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version. Galaxy A31 is an extremely older and just a little thicker phone than Galaxy A25 5G, but Samsung was able to build it a little bit lighter anyway.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy A31, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little larger display. The Samsung Galaxy A31 features a much better processing power than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a lot tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lot lower quality photographs and videos, it also counts with a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in low light situations and a way better video resolution.
Galaxy A25 5G counts with a superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A31, because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A25 5G's battery performance is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A31 one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.