Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 411 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 has a global score of 88.1, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A31's overall score of 81.3. Even though the Galaxy F62 is newer than Samsung Galaxy A31, it's just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy F62 has a more recent 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A31 has Android 10, offering some additional features and better performance.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a bit better looking display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch in the display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also counts with a little bigger display. Galaxy F62 has a bit better processor than Galaxy A31, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy F62 takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a larger sensor capturing higher quality pictures, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a larger aperture for better low-light photography and video and a back facing camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy A31, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.