Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is slightly better than the Galaxy A31, getting a score of 89 against 81.3. Galaxy Note10 is a just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner cellphone than Galaxy A31, even when both of them were only released 8 months apart. The Galaxy Note10 features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a display that is very similar to the screen in Galaxy A31, although the Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a bit smaller display, a little worse 1080 x 2280 pixels resolution and a bit inferior amount of pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy Note10 features a better storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A31 features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a much tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Galaxy A31 features a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.