Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-04-27 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is much better than Galaxy A31's 81.3 overall score. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer phone than the Galaxy A31, although it is somewhat heavier and just a little bit thicker. These phones come with Android OS, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version while Galaxy A31 has Android 10 version, giving you a lot of extra features and performance improvements.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Galaxy A31, because it has a little bit better display density, a little bit larger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088. The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A31, because it has a way bigger back camera sensor, a much higher video resolution, a back camera with way more mega-pixels and a larger camera aperture.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery performance is just as good as the battery duration in Galaxy A31.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.