Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-27 | -- |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.53 ounces | -- |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is just a bit better than Galaxy A31, getting a score of 82.6 against 81.3. The Galaxy S25 is a extremely lighter and extremely thinner phone than Galaxy A31. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 has the newer 14 version and Galaxy A31 has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a much faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better display density.
Galaxy A31 features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy S25 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a much bigger sensor providing a way higher image quality, a way higher video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture for better images in low-light environments and a more MP back camera.
Galaxy A31 has improved battery lifetime than Galaxy S25, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.