Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-27 | -- |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | -- |
| 6.53 ounces | -- |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | -- |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is much better than Samsung Galaxy A31, getting a global score of 90.7 against 81.3. Both devices we are comparing here have Android OS, but Galaxy S25 Ultra has 14 version and Samsung Galaxy A31 has Android 10 version, so it provides the user a lot of extra features and enhanced performance. Galaxy S25 Ultra's body is noticeably thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy A31.
Galaxy A31 counts with a much powerful processor than Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has 8 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a much better screen than Galaxy A31, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3088, a just a little higher screen pixels density and a bit larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A31, because it has a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality, a lot higher video quality, a camera with way more MP and a bigger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos. Galaxy S25 Ultra features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy S25 Ultra features a battery lifetime that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy A31's battery performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.