Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-27 | -- |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black Shadow |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 10.89 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is better than Galaxy A31, getting a 91.1 score against 81.3. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's body is heavier but much thinner than the Galaxy A31. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has the newer 14 version and Galaxy A31 has Android 10, so it gives some nice extra features.
The Galaxy A31 features an extremely better processor than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition features a brighter screen than Galaxy A31, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a bigger display and a higher 1968 x 2184px resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition captures slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy A31, because it has a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a bigger aperture for better low light photography and videos. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A31, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A31 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.