Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.3 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-27 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 411 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MC2 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 is a bit better than the Xperia XZs, having a general score of 81.3 against 77.2. The Galaxy A31 construction is a lot newer, but somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker than the Xperia XZs. Galaxy A31 has a little bit better processing power than Xperia XZs, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Galaxy A31 also has 4 more cpu cores.
Galaxy A31 and Xperia XZs both count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Xperia XZs has a little smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 1920px resolution, it also counts with a little greater amount of pixels in each inch of display. The Sony Xperia XZs shoots better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A31, because although it has a tinier camera sensor which provides a worse image and video quality and a back camera with lot less megapixels resolution, and they both have the same camera aperture, the Sony Xperia XZs also counts with a much higher video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Xperia XZs, because it has 64 GB internal memory and an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A31 features a very superior battery performance than Xperia XZs, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.