Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-04-11 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 5.98 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Aurora black, Carmine red and Platinum gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 215.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8 ThinQ is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, getting an 84.3 score against 75. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG G8 ThinQ has 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version. Even though LG G8 ThinQ is older than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, it's construction is lighter and just a little bit thinner.
LG G8 ThinQ has a really superior performance than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG G8 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The LG G8 ThinQ features a much better screen than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way greater screen pixel density and a much better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
Galaxy A32 5G counts with just a bit better camera than LG G8 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
LG G8 ThinQ has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G has a much better battery duration than LG G8 ThinQ, because it has a 43 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.