Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 89.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Midnight magenta and Solar black |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 544.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 18.58 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has a score of 89.6, which is much better than Galaxy A32 5G's general score of 75. The Motorola edge construction is just a little bit thicker but just a little bit lighter than Galaxy A32 5G, and both of them were released with only 8 months difference. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola edge has the previous 10 version while Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version.
Motorola edge counts with a very superior CPU than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Motorola edge also has a greater amount of RAM. Motorola edge has a much better looking display than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a quite bigger screen, a higher number of pixels per display inch and a much higher 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Motorola edge has a much greater memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Motorola edge takes better videos and photos than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same video definition and a F1.8 aperture, the Motorola edge also has a lot more MP back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with just a bit better battery life than Motorola edge, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.