Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-01-22 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 6.03 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.89 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a global score of 87.1, which is better than Galaxy A32 5G's 75 general score. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS, but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has 14 version while Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version, providing you some nice extra features. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is noticeably newer, a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Galaxy A32 5G.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a way higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, a higher screen density and a quite larger display. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a superior camera than Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has faster video frame rates, a larger aperture to take better photography and video in low-light situations and a more MP camera in the back.
Galaxy A32 5G counts with just a little better battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.