Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-01-22 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.23 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Metal and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.89 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is way better than Galaxy A32 5G, getting a 97.6 score against 75. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A32 5G has Android 11 version, offering some additional features and better performance. Galaxy Fold's construction is notably thinner than the Galaxy A32 5G, although it's notably heavier and was released around a year before.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a lot better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy Fold has a much better display than Galaxy A32 5G, because it has a better pixels density, a much better resolution of 1536 x 2152px and a little bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 5G counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing photos and/or video in low light environments and worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A32 5G also counts with a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32 5G, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A32 5G features just a little better battery performance than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.